Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Friday Nov 28 2025 01:10
4 min
Texas appears to be taking decisive steps toward becoming the first US state to integrate Bitcoin into its strategic reserves. As revealed by Lee Bratcher, President of the Texas Blockchain Council, the state has already invested $5 million in BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF (IBIT). An additional $5 million is expected to be allocated to directly acquire Bitcoin once the framework required for custody and liquidity under the state’s new reserve law is finalized.
This two-pronged approach aims to bridge the gap between current institutional operations and a future model where the government not only purchases Bitcoin but also holds it. While the initial $5 million investment may seem modest compared to Texas's overall financial scale, the implications of this move extend beyond the investment size itself.
Instead of directly holding Bitcoin initially, Texas opted for the IBIT ETF as an entry vehicle. IBIT represents an appealing option for large financial players seeking to allocate Bitcoin within familiar regulatory and operational frameworks. The legal basis for this purchase stems from Senate Bill 21, signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott in June of this year. This bill formally established the “Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.”
The law permits the state comptroller to increase the state's Bitcoin holdings if it maintains an average market capitalization of at least $500 billion for 24 months. Currently, Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency that meets this market capitalization criterion. This reserve is separate from the state's fiscal treasury, delineates asset management operations, and establishes an advisory committee for risk monitoring and oversight.
The selection of IBIT as an entry vehicle doesn't indicate a preference for ETFs over native Bitcoin, but rather a pragmatic workaround. IBIT has quickly emerged as the most widely held Bitcoin ETF among mainstream institutions within just two years of its launch. Furthermore, most jurisdictions still lack public sector self-custody systems for Bitcoin. Establishing such infrastructure requires complex procurement, security modeling, and policy approvals. Therefore, Texas is using IBIT as a “transitional tool” while building a permanent reserve architecture.
This approach resonates with the investment strategies adopted by other large financial entities. Harvard University recently disclosed that IBIT was among its largest US equity holdings in Q3. The Abu Dhabi Investment Council tripled its IBIT holdings to nearly 8 million shares during the same period. Earlier this year, the Wisconsin Retirement System allocated over $160 million to spot Bitcoin ETFs, including IBIT. Despite differences in investment objectives, geographic locations, and risk structures, these institutions have collectively chosen IBIT, given its custody services through reputable intermediaries, streamlined reporting processes, and clear accounting requirements under new fair value rules taking effect in 2025.
Whether Texas’s move is an isolated case or whether it will serve as a blueprint for other states is a crucial question. Bitcoin analyst Shanaka Anslem Perera anticipates that four to eight other states will follow suit in the next 18 months. Collectively, these states control over $1.2 trillion in reserve funds. Supported by a “bandwagon effect,” institutional inflows in the short term are projected to reach $300 million to $1.5 billion.
Politically aligned states, such as New Hampshire and Arizona, have already introduced legislation related to Bitcoin reserves, viewing Bitcoin as a strategic asset to hedge against the risks of the global financial system. More states may join the effort after new accounting standards eliminate previous “mark-to-market” penalties.
The impact of state government involvement in the Bitcoin market extends beyond mere symbolism. ETF purchases do not affect the circulating supply of Bitcoin, as trust structures do not remove Bitcoin from liquid markets when issuing and redeeming shares. However, “self-custody” has the opposite effect. Once Bitcoin is purchased and moved into cold storage, it withdraws from the available trading pool, reducing the supply of Bitcoin available to exchanges and market makers.
If Texas expands its Bitcoin reserves beyond the initial $10 million investment, this distinction will become more significant. Even modest state-level demand will introduce a new type of buying participant—one with counter-cyclical behavior and infrequent position adjustments. This effect is more like a “stable anchor” rather than a source of volatility. If other states adopt similar policies, the elasticity of Bitcoin's supply curve will be further reduced, increasing price sensitivity.
Risk Warning: this article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform.When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange) and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and could result in capital loss.Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be construed to be investment advice. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.