Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Thursday Dec 4 2025 00:10
3 min
Recently, the Hyperliquid HIP3 protocol has gained immense popularity, enabling the trading of a wide array of assets such as stock perps, gold perps, and even Pokémon cards and CS skins. While Hyperliquid has captured much of the spotlight, the significant surge in liquidity that Arbitrum has experienced often goes unnoticed. But, could Arbitrum be the real 'silent winner' of Hyperliquid's success?
Hyperliquid heavily relies on Arbitrum for its USDC supply. When a TSLA stock perp or a gold perp is launched on Hyperliquid, it triggers a massive influx of USDC from Arbitrum. This isn't a mere coincidental relationship; it's a structural dependence. These bridging activities directly contribute to Arbitrum's daily trading volume and ecosystem activity, further solidifying its position as the leading Layer-2 solution.
Some might argue that Arbitrum is simply a transit point for funds heading to Hyperliquid. However, the question arises: why did Hyperliquid choose Arbitrum over Solana or Base? There are several key reasons:
The relationship between Hyperliquid and Arbitrum is far from a simple parasitic one. Hyperliquid, as a Perp Dex application chain, constantly stimulates trading activity, while Arbitrum provides continuous liquidity infusion. Arbitrum needs prominent applications like Hyperliquid to address the shortcomings in the Ethereum ecosystem in terms of product strength. This is reminiscent of when Arbitrum introduced the Orbit layer3 framework, emphasizing "general-purpose layer2 + specialized application chain." Orbit allows any team to quickly deploy their own Layer3 application chain, enjoying Arbitrum's security and liquidity, and customizing performance parameters based on business needs.
While Hyperliquid chose the path of building its own Layer-1 + deep integration with Arbitrum, it's not exactly the same as directly deploying a Layer-3. However, a careful analysis of the relationship between the HIP-3 ecosystem and Arbitrum reveals an interesting conclusion: HIP3 has somewhat become Arbitrum's de facto Layer3 application chain. After all, the core logic of so-called Layer3 is to outsource security and liquidity to Layer2 while maintaining its own performance advantages. Clearly, Hyperliquid cannot provide the liquidity advantages for the HIP3 ecosystem at the moment, but Arbitrum can. Isn't this a variant of the layer3 operation model?
Risk Warning: this article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform.When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange) and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and could result in capital loss.Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be construed to be investment advice. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.