Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Wednesday Apr 1 2026 00:00
5 min
Despite the latest dot plot still indicating that Federal Reserve policymakers anticipate interest rate cuts later this year, a closer look reveals another emerging signal. Against a backdrop of tariffs and oil prices pushing inflation higher, and a labor market that is softening but not collapsing, some officials are now hinting that their next move could be a hike, rather than a cut. This is a subtle but significant shift. Just weeks ago, the interest rate path was clearly pointing downwards. However, over the past week, multiple officials have released hawkish signals. Governor Cook, whose views generally align with the Fed's majority, stated that energy price increases stemming from the Middle East conflict are further exacerbating inflationary pressures, and that persistent inflation is re-emerging as the primary risk facing the Fed. Chicago Fed President Goolsbee became one of the first officials to explicitly mention the possibility of a rate hike. "If inflation trends are mild, we could still be on a path for multiple rate cuts this year," he told CNBC. "But I can also envision a scenario where a hike is needed.""
While a rate hike remains a low-probability event, the mere mention of this possibility warrants attention. Fed Chair Powell stated earlier this month that during the two most recent meetings, officials did not opt to include the "next move likely a hike" option in their public statements. Even if rates do not rise, the probability that the six-round rate-cutting cycle that began in September 2024 has now concluded is increasing. The market's adjustment to the Fed's evolving expectations is precisely what has driven the significant increase in long-term interest rates since the recent geopolitical flare-up. Traders have revised their expectations for future interest rates upward, even pricing in the possibility of a small hike this year. As these expectations are reflected in bond yields, businesses and households have immediately felt the impact, such as rising mortgage rates.
Officials sometimes push back against market pricing that diverges from their own policy expectations. However, Matthew Luzzetti, Chief U.S. Economist at Deutsche Bank, argues that the Fed currently has no reason to object, given the heightened inflation anxiety fueled by the Middle East conflict. He believes that the market's new expectation of stable or rising future interest rates is advantageous for the Fed. Importantly, many of the recent hawkish pronouncements have come from officials previously considered neutral or dovish. Governor Waller, a consistent strong advocate for rate cuts, stated this month that the inflation risks from the Middle East conflict led her to support holding rates steady in March. The Fed publishes its dot plot quarterly, showing the expectations of 19 policymakers for year-end interest rate levels. The market typically extracts strong signals from this; the median expectation in the March dot plot was for one more rate cut this year.
However, dovish San Francisco Fed President Daly suggested that this guidance could be misleading. She wrote in a LinkedIn post that it "might convey a false sense of certainty. . . making it harder for the public to clearly anticipate how the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will react." She wrote that there is no single most likely path for interest rates. Powell himself has downplayed the significance of the dot plot. At his press conference this month, he stated, "This time more than usual, forecasts should be taken with a grain of salt."
Of course, reasons to cut rates still exist. U.S. nonfarm payrolls fell by more than 90,000 in February, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.4%. Many economists believe that if tensions in the Middle East ease, oil prices will retreat from current levels, and inflation will continue to move towards the Fed's 2% target over time. If oil prices surge significantly, it could severely damage consumer spending and employment, forcing the Fed to cut rates to avoid a recession. Christopher Hodge, Chief U.S. Economist at Natixis, believes further rate cuts are still possible this year, stating, "The economy didn't have a ton of momentum coming into the year." However, multiple factors are raising the bar for the Fed to cut rates further. Since September 2024, the target range for the federal funds rate has been lowered by nearly 2 percentage points, to 3.5%–3.75%. Further cuts would bring it closer to the neutral level that neither restrains nor stimulates inflation.
Economists can only guess at the exact location of the neutral rate, but a growing number of Fed officials are suggesting that rates may have reached it. Vice Chair Jefferson stated last Thursday that the Fed's recent rate cuts "have brought the stance of monetary policy to roughly neutral." Richmond Fed President Barkin stated last Friday that after the rate cut, the "federal funds rate is at the high end of neutral." If rates are indeed at neutral, further cuts would effectively mean fueling inflation. Officials also recognize that inflation has exceeded the Fed's 2% target for six consecutive years as of this month, and they worry about the public forming expectations of persistently high inflation. Such expectations tend to become self-fulfilling. In this scenario, simply waiting for tariffs or oil price spikes to dissipate would not be sufficient to bring inflation back to 2%. By the Fed's preferred measure, inflation is currently running at about 3%. The Middle East conflict is pushing up high-frequency consumer prices like gasoline and food, further exacerbating this risk. Derek Tang, an analyst at Monetary Policy Analytics, said Fed officials "really don't want to see inflation expectations move up. . . The question is, they don't know how close they are to the edge."
However, the Fed can take some comfort: there is currently no evidence of a significant upward shift in inflation expectations. Last Friday, the University of Michigan's March consumer survey showed that while short-term inflation expectations had ticked up slightly, long-term expectations remained moderate.
Risk Warning: this article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform.When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange) and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and could result in capital loss.Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be construed to be investment advice. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.