Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Friday Nov 21 2025 01:10
2 min
Key Takeaways:
Let me start by clarifying that my institution and I hold both ETH and SOL. Therefore, our critiques of ETH aren't driven by a bias toward SOL. Ethereum's problems are chronic and won't disappear due to past hype.
Ethereum is like an international NGO federation: bureaucratic, decentralized, and attentive to due process. Vitalik Buterin is like an emperor who lost his centralized power too early, making Layer 2 (L2) more like fiefdoms. The proportion of taxes these local fiefdoms pay to the center is very small. It's akin to the breakup of the Soviet Union or the Commonwealth of Nations after the collapse of the British Empire. Will Ethereum become like IBM? Companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia are worth trillions, while IBM still struggles. It's a strong brand that exports technology and empowers others, but its business doesn't take a significant cut of the market. The tax-collection model is the strongest, as seen with Amazon.
The long-standing problem is that developers close to the foundation who can boast about their relationship with the foundation enjoy "legitimacy" and receive more attention from investors and the community. This sycophantic culture contradicts Ethereum's original principles. Additionally, some major Wall Street institutions mentioned in private conversations that they come to ETH because it's the first blockchain with a long history, reliability, and a strong brand. Another reason is that they want to launch permissioned chains, and ETH's technology has been verified in this regard over the years. This approach treats ETH like IBM. Wall Street institutions seem to share a similar mindset with Chinese financial institutions.
In comparison, Solana is a typical example of an entrepreneurial team culture: centralized, efficient, and with strong execution. The business model is an integrated unit where one coin supports the entire system. The developer culture is like Burning Man: young, enthusiastic, and with a strong experimental spirit, closer to a university hacker culture. From a team and cultural perspective, I think Solana is more like a multinational tech startup team. In any case, everyone is making a joint effort to put global assets on the blockchain. Competition is good for all of us.
Risk Warning: this article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform.When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange) and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and could result in capital loss.Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be construed to be investment advice. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.